Michael Lammer vs Rajeev Ram Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L L L L
Form
W W L L L W L L L LHead To Head: Lammer 1 - 0 Ram
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lammer winning 2 and Ram winning 0. The last match between Lammer and Ram was at the Mexico City Challenger, 16-04-2013, First, Hard with Michael Lammer getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Michael Lammer | 1 |
| Rajeev Ram | 0 |
| Lammer | Stats | Ram |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 150 | Highest Rank | 56 |
| 43 | Age | 41 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 10 |
| 55% (399-331) | Career Total W/L | 52% (427-388) |
| $153,020 | Career Prize Money | $956,891 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Michael Lammer
Player
Rajeev Ram
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
31%
(
13 of
42)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:5:5 | Average Match Time | 1:5:5 |
| 67% (33/49) | 1st Serve % | 31% (13/42) |
| 61% (20/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 69% (11/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (10/29) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 64% (27/42) | Return Points Win % | 37% (18/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Michael Lammer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Michael Lammer
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Michael Lammer
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Wang
Player
Michael Lammer
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
76)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Fischer
Player
Michael Lammer
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Maxime Teixeira
38%
(
24 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Tom Jomby
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Bruno Volkmann
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 |
Stats
Andreas Seppi
Player
Michael Lammer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Gicquel
Player
Michael Lammer
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rajeev Ram Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Attila Balazs
Player
Rajeev Ram
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Rajeev Ram
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Rajeev Ram
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Rajeev Ram
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Reilly Opelka
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
8
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Rajeev Ram
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
21 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Rajeev Ram
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Mirza Basic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Stefan Kozlov
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (399/331) | Win/Loss | 52% (427/388) |
| 54% (909/768) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (1009/932) |
| 52% (8049/7532) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (9694/9521) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 454 | Aces Total | 3216 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 548 | Total Double Faults | 1000 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 599.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 604.88 |
| 57% (7443/12996) | 1st Serve % | 63% (20063/32097) |
| 66% (4944/7443) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (14814/20063) |
| 48% (2690/5556) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6061/12040) |
| 43% (558/1301) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (942/2580) |
| 40% (5146/12829) | Return Points Win % | 35% (11434/32352) |
| 55% (388/705) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (417/779) |
| 14% (1/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (7/26) |
| 55% (101/185) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (200/381) |
| 49% (110/226) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (140/278) |
| 85% (398/337) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (423/346) |
| 15% (398/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (423/75) |
| 19% (332/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (392/79) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
